Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Guillermo Garcia v. Linda Yoon et al
as 2:2011cv07872
Defendant:
Leroy D Baca, Leroy D Baca, Mr Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Garcia
Floyd Hills Nelson et al v. Cityof Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv05407
Defendant:
Allen, Anthony Avila, Leroy D Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Harris and Floyd Hills Nelson
John Len Parrish v. Leroy D Baca et al
as 2:2011cv03197
Respondent:
Administrative Office of the Courts, Leroy D Baca, Leroy D Baca and others
Petitioner:
John Len Parrish
Steven Irvin v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 11-55540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DERRICK IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEROY D. BACA, LA County Sheriff, TAY S. KIM, Physician, SANDER PECK, Chief Medical Officer and others
Williams v. Baca et al
as 2:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Williams
Defendant:
Leroy D Baca, County of Los Angeles, Jonathan Pera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Alfred Caballero v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv00493
Defendant:
Leroy D. Baca, Leroy D. Baca, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Caballero
Ervin St. Amand v. Sherman Block, et al
as 10-57007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERVIN CHARLES ST. AMAND
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERMAN BLOCK, JERRY L. HARPER, WILLIAM CHRISTIANSEN and others
Kenneth Preston Blanton v. Longaria et al
as 2:2010cv08465
Defendant:
Sheriff Leroy D Baca, Sheriff Leroy D Baca, Dr. Davitian and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Preston Blanton
Vester Patterson v. D. Sisto, et al
as 10-56668
Petitioner - Appellant:
VESTER LEE PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO and LEROY D. BACA
John Parrish v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 10-56163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEN PARRISH, an all similarly classed et, al., Substituted for John L. Parrish
Defendant - Appellee:
LEROY D. BACA, individual and official capacity, Substituted for Lee Baca and JUDICIAL COUNSEL OF CALIFORNIA, individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
