Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Nguyen v. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00399
Petitioner: Hung Nguyen
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simpson v. Feltsen, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00302
Plaintiff: Shabondy Lamar Simpson
Defendant: N Feltson, M. C. Kramer, J Broddrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Victor Arnold v. M. Kramer
as 09-55128
Petitioner - Appellant: VICTOR CRAIG ARNOLD
Respondent - Appellee: M. C. KRAMER, Warden
James Duval v. M. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15126
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES ELMOND DUVAL
Respondent - Appellee: M. C. KRAMER
Rhodes v. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv03122
Petitioner: Bernard Rhodes
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calvin S. Secrest v. M.C. Kramer
as 2:2008cv07950
Petitioner: Calvin S. Secrest
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Kramer
as 2:2008cv02764
Petitioner: Shabondy Lamar Simpson
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01713
Plaintiff: Kashley Roy Williams
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomason v. Pacillas et al
as 2:2008cv02599
Plaintiff: Joseph Steven Thomason
Defendant: R Pacillas, M H Casey and M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eric Thomas v. M. Kramer, et al
as 08-56728
Petitioner - Appellant: ERIC ANGEL THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: M. C. KRAMER and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?