Cases 41 - 50 of 930
Robert Snyder v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-55037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT R. SNYDER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, CDCR and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Michael Anthony Powell v. R. Madden
as 2:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Powell
Respondent:
R. Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckelew v. Lovelace et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dion Scott Buckelew
Defendant:
Captain Lovelace, Captain Darnell, Lieutenant Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Donivan Diaz v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55061
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONIVAN DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Hooks v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Da Ron Hooks
Respondent:
R. Madden and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Victor Sanchez Alcantar v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez Alcantar
Respondent:
Madden, ., Mrs. Pays and Mr Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasson Hedgepeth v. R. Madden
as 22-16853
Petitioner / Appellant:
HASSON HEDGEPETH
Respondent / Appellee:
R. MADDEN
Blackgold v. Madden
as 3:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Suten Blackgold
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-56027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
