Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Hall v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv23607
Plaintiff:
Milton Hall
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Florida Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. MARSHALL et al
as 5:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant:
J MARSHALL, C W SPOONER, T P STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATTIEL v. WEEKS et al
as 1:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE NATTIEL
Defendant:
KIMBERLY WEEKS, LOTT, GERALD MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. HENRY
as 3:2015cv00255
Petitioner:
JOHN MILTON PHILLIPS, JR
Respondent:
MARK HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv21783
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Milton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Flordia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv60931
Plaintiff:
Cory Milton
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. LEAVINS et al.
as 5:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant:
D LEAVINS, CORIZON HEALTH COMPANY, C E DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Petitioner:
Nathon Alan Hale
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Milton Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JOHN PALMER , JEFFREY MCCLELLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Crews, et al
as 6:2014cv01783
Plaintiff:
Stanley Dickerson
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Michael Moore, Carol J. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
