Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Moore v. Oregon Board of Parole/Post-Prison Supervision
as 3:2013cv01753
Petitioner:
Ernest G. Moore
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole/Post-Prison Supervision
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01899
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv01043
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Petitioner:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv01044
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Petitioner:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore et al v. Coarsey et al
as 2:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Jeri Annette Apt and Buck Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Dr. Carper, Rick Coarsey, Captain Dahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Coursey et al
as 2:2011cv01545
Defendant:
Superintedant Rick Coursey, Govenor Kitzopher, Ms. Sabota and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Jordet et al
as 3:2011cv01376
Defendant:
Sgt. Artz, H.S. Dr. Carper, H.S. Dr. Digulio and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Studenburg
as 1:2011cv01348
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Philip W. Studenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karboau v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv06312
Defendant:
Alica Aleson, Trent Axen, Bales and others
Plaintiff:
Milaudi Karboau
Amicu:
Officer Park and Counselor Ragland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
