Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Muhammad v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00705
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Marvin Davis, Norman Thigpen, Alex Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delarco v. Akhtar, M.D. et al
as 3:2010cv00244
Defendant:
Muhammad Akhtar, M.D. and Carlos Esquivia
Plaintiff:
Juan Delarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Marvin Davis, Elio Madan, William Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goni v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2009cv01258
Plaintiff:
Fidel Perez Goni
Defendant:
Akhtar Muhammad, M.D., William F. Mathews, J. Scott Thayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahim v. McCracken et al
as 2:2009cv14390
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Abdul Rahim
Defendant:
R. McCracken and Haridas Bhadja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv01604
Plaintiff:
Malik Mahdi Muhammad
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPENCE v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN SPENCE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, DENISE PAYNE, MARCELLUS TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Akhtar, M.D.
as 3:2008cv00994
Plaintiff:
John L. Anderson
Defendant:
Muhammad Akhtar, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. Sapp et al
as 2:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
George Sapp, D. A. Colon, R. J. Poccia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahim v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv21565
Petitioner:
Muhammad Abdul Rahim
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
