Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Archuleta et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
Joseph Archuleta, Christopher Asjes, Eddie Chavez and others
Defendant:
Joe R Williams, George Tapia and Lawrence Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. G.E.O. State of New Mexico Medical et al
as 1:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
Angel Perez
Defendant:
Warden, Correctional Officers, Special Task Investigation Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Angel Aragon Perez
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, GEO Medical Staff Psychologist, Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
Angel Perez
Defendant:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robles v. Torres et al
as 1:2008cv00880
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Robles
Defendant:
Ron Torres, Mike Sisneros, Patrick Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomez-Perez v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00857
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gomez-Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Perez-Benitez v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
Fermin Perez-Benitez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. Perez et al
as 1:2008cv00321
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Flores
Defendant:
Ann Marie Perez, Frank Salcido and Antony Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Luna et al
as 2:2008cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael Martinez Perez
Defendant:
Richard C Luna, Sam Trujillo, Don Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Herrera-Perez et al
as 1:2007cv00597
Defendant:
Francisco Herrera-Perez, Michael Chertoff and Robert E Jolicoeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
