Cases 41 - 50 of 218
JACKSON et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv17943
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I-X, GEORGE ROBINSON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JACKSON and RODNEY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LIDDELL v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2019cv16334
Petitioner:
THOMAS L. LIDDELL
Respondent:
GEORGE O. ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LIDDELL v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2019cv16427
Petitioner:
THOMAS L. LIDDELL
Respondent:
GEORGE O. ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv07249
Respondent:
R. ROBINSON, CMC MRS. NEVINS, A.W. SMITH and others
Petitioner:
SHIRLAND FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELSKIS v. UNIT TEAM et al
as 1:2019cv08669
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Respondent:
UNIT TEAM, SECRETARY, MILETTA and others
Defendant:
JOHN & JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANDICH v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv17672
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JOHN MANDICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MASON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2019cv04655
Defendant:
BRUCE KERNER and GEORGE ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
LARRY MASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2019cv04733
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JOSHUA ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
