Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Littlejohn v. Brasher et al
as 1:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
The Honorable Christopher Brasher, Cathlene "Tina" Robinson, The Honorable Kelly Ellerbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DRAKE et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
DRAKE, ROBERT, ROVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOES
as 3:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v HOLLEY
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
JULIA HOLLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MINTON et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON, CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE and ALCOVY JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
