Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Wells v. The City of New York, et al et al
as 1:2009cv03479
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Wells
Defendant:
The City of New York, et al, Robert T. Johnson, Wayne Gosnell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Hilderbrand et al
as 5:2009cv03070
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristie Hilderbrand, John Hurla, Pottawatomie Tribal Courts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Gilcrest et al
as 5:2009cv03063
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
J. L. Gilcrest, (fnu) Johnson, (fnu) Burke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Godwin v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
Edward Godwin
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Rocco Ruscdtto, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mims v. Grant et al
as 1:2009cv01481
Plaintiff:
George Mims
Defendant:
Robert Grant, Frank Bari, ESQ. and Robert T. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgos v. Cohen et al
as 6:2009cv06031
Plaintiff:
Edwin Burgos
Defendant:
Barbara J. Cohen, Lawrence Tonetti, Robert T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Alexander et al
as 1:2008cv08618
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodriguez
Defendant:
George B. Alexander, Jeb Harben, Janice L. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Alexander et al
as 1:2008cv03949
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodriguez
Defendant:
George B. Alexander, Jeb Harben, Janice L. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Beck et al
as 1:2008cv05202
Plaintiff:
Wildy Rodriguez
Defendant:
Melissa D. Beck, Robert T. Johnson and L. Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Billips v. Difillipi et al
as 1:2008cv05079
Plaintiff:
Alkim Billips
Defendant:
Daniel Difillipi and Robert T. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
