Cases 41 - 50 of 691
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Guerrero Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jose Jr. Guerrero Lozano and Jose Guerrero Lozano, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2023cv10264
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
W WALTERS, C LESSER, T BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ-RABIN v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
ROSE RODRIGUEZ RABIN and ROSE RODRIGUEZ-RABIN
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Felix v. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv21658
Plaintiff:
Michael Felix
Defendant:
Ariel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jose G Lozano
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENA RODRIGUEZ v. RICKY D. DIXON, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv21253
Defendant:
Enrique Pena-Rodriguez and Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Jose G Lozano
Respondent:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 1:2023cv20892
Plaintiff:
Jose G Lozano
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Weylin O. Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
