Cases 41 - 50 of 770
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore, J.M. Ebert, J.M. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. City of Dunwoody et al
as 1:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Scott
Defendant:
City of Dunwoody, Jason's Deli Restaurant, Walmart Shopping Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. EMMONS
as 5:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
SCOTT LYONS
Respondent:
WARDEN SEAN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashlin v. Walker
as 1:2023cv02209
Petitioner:
Richard Scott Ashlin
Respondent:
Herbert Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Emmons
as 4:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Scott Lyons
Respondent:
Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Charlie Scott
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Well Path and Grady Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Ella et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Scott
Defendant:
Unit Mngr Ella, Officer Hawkins and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Marvin Martin
Respondent:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
