Cases 41 - 50 of 1,566
Bashum v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bashum
Defendant:
Keenan M Smith, Brittany Greene, Kimberly Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharkey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15030
Plaintiff:
Markees Sharkey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 1:2023cv14758
Petitioner:
Eric S Smith
Respondent:
People of The State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. DeLeo et al
as 3:2023cv03295
Plaintiff:
Marc Thornton
Defendant:
John DeLeo, Tracey Vasil Biscontini, Valerie Behrle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Eric S. Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv03287
Plaintiff:
Dayne Woods
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff's Office, Jack Campbell, Larry Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv02207
Petitioner:
Deandre Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10817
Plaintiff:
Malique Clark
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Richard Smith, Uknown Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
