Cases 41 - 50 of 405
MONTGOMERY v. GAMP et al
as 2:2021cv16607
Petitioner:
STEVEN D. MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
JOHNATHAN GAMP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDONE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2021cv15265
Petitioner:
JOSEPH RANDONE
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. HICKS et al
as 3:2021cv14258
Plaintiff:
RANDY KAREEM WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, F. ALBIANO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASIEDU v. PASSAIC COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv12982
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 TO 10, DETECTIVE STEVEN SIETSMA, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O. ASIEDU and KELVIN O. ASIEDU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYER et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv12393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TARBY, MANUEL DIAZ, GLENN JONES and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. BERGEN COUNTY, et al
as 2:2021cv11359
Defendant:
MICHAEL TSIOLAS, STEVEN AHRENDT, P. ALLEGRETTA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURT v. HICKS et al
as 1:2020cv19459
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. BURT
Defendant:
JOHN POWELL, MARCUS O. HICKS and ERIN NARDELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv19185
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
