Cases 41 - 50 of 159
Carter v. State of Wyoming et al
as 0:2020cv00194
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Petitioner:
Charles K Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dukes v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2019cv00233
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General, State of Wyoming and Carbon County
Petitioner:
Leonard Dukes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Brunt v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2019cv00095
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Petitioner:
Derek Van Brunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. State of Wyoming
as 2:2018cv00020
Petitioner:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kimbrough v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2017cv00118
Petitioner:
William Warren Kimbrough
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Capozzoli v State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Capozzoli
Defendant:
State of Wyoming , Wyoming Department of Corrections , Corizon Health Service Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon v. Pacheco, et al
as 17-8030
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE WELDON
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, Wyoming Department of Corrections and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Petitioner:
Kelvin W Williams
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huckfeldt v. State of Wyoming
as 16-8131
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH J. HUCKFELDT
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING
Magallanes v. Harding et al
as 2:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Eddie Magallanes
Defendant:
P Harding, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Correctional Officer, Eddie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
