Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Hurtado v. The Geo Group Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutierrez Hurtado
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc, BOP, E Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lerma v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Ortega Lerma
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc and BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Lira Moreno
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Taylor Baxter, Medical Department Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Dickie et al
as 4:2015cv00774
Petitioner:
George Yarbrough
Respondent:
Grant Dickie, Joe Smith, Scott Spaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marte v. The Geo Group Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Marte
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc., Bureau of Prisons, Officer A. Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marte v. The Geo Group Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Marte
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc., Bureau of Prisons, Officer A. Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. Geo Group Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jose Pierre
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc, Dwight Sims, Dr. Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fitzgerald Taylor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Warden Ricardo Martinez, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00060
Defendant:
Clarence Anthony, Norman Clarkson, Richard Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fitzgerald Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. The GEO Group, Inc. - Central Texas Detention Facility
as 5:2014cv00139
Petitioner:
Samuel Micah Dyer
Respondent:
The GEO Group, Inc. - Central Texas Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
