Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Fordjour v. Mukasey, et al.
as 1:2008cv00885
Petitioner:
Charles Fordjour
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, USA, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv02784
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of State, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gomis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv02785
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Senate, United States House of Representative and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gomis v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2008cv02679
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
United States Of America, United States Department of State, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fordjour v. Mueller et al
as 1:2008cv00731
Petitioner:
Charles Fordjour
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Allan McClain, John Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv02387
Petitioner:
Lavell Rondell Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, John R Simpson, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Victor Nwankwo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2007cv05572
Plaintiff:
Victor Nwankwo
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Alexander Ifeanyi Ijemba v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2007cv03668
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ifeanyi Ijemba
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
