Cases 41 - 50 of 389
HERRING v. BERRY
as 5:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
JAMES HERRING
Respondent:
WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westbrooks v. Coweta County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Westbrooks
Defendant:
Coweta County Jail and Chief Sheriff Lynn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Berry
as 1:2022cv01903
Petitioner:
Joseph Martin Barnes
Respondent:
Warden Walter Berry and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GERMANY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
QUINTARIUS SMITH GERMANY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Warden WALTER BERRY, SGT COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Berry
as 1:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Karl E. King
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Walter Berry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BARRY et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
ARDENTRIC D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BARRY, SGT SAMANTHA BROWN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenny v. Fort
as 1:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Walter Lawrence Kenny and Walter Lawrence Kenney
Respondent:
Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARGREAVES v. BERRY
as 4:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Respondent:
Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCURTY v. TROTMAN et al
as 5:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
LT TROTMAN, LT WALLER, LT BOOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGREAVES v. BERRY
as 5:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Respondent:
WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
