Cases 41 - 50 of 57
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hartmann et al
as 1:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Jones
Defendant:
Greg Hartmann and Scott M. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. McClain et al
as 3:2014cv00132
Petitioner:
Ernest Watson
Respondent:
Ms McClain, Donna White, D Teare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treesh v. Watson et al
as 2:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
James H Treesh
Defendant:
Robert Watson, Dan Alexander, Tracy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golsby v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Brian Golsby
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dave Hoffman, John Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hooper et al
as 4:2012cv01668
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
K. Hooper, Charles Lockett, Complex Warden at Terra Haute USP Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00362
Petitioner:
Gerald Watson
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Stuyvesant v. Jonah Cancer and Blood Treatment Pavilion et al
as 1:2010cv00110
Plaintiff:
Curtis Van Stuyvesant
Defendant:
Jonah Cancer and Blood Treatment Pavilion, Zale Bernstein, Tanya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. State of Ohio et al
as 4:2010cv00293
Petitioner:
Charles N. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Ohio Attorney General, U.S. Marshals Service, Northern District of Ohio, R. Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Cleveland Police Dept. et al
as 1:2008cv02007
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Watson, Sr.
Defendant:
Cleveland Police Dept., First District Police Dept., Jonathan Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
