Cases 41 - 50 of 559
Clemens v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nijhof Clemens
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey and Deputy Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearn v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Thorne Deon Hearn
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Chief Singleton, Sergeant Hammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hester v. Aramark et al
as 6:2022cv02435
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hester
Defendant:
Aramark, Florida Dept of Health, Wayne Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrington v. Ivey et al
as 6:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
Arnaz V. Barrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Chief Singletary, FL Dept of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessinger v. Yes Care et al
as 6:2022cv02418
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kessinger
Defendant:
Yes Care, Wayne Ivey and Chief Singletary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WAYNE ALLEN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSL DOC, MS J HEDRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Aramark et al
as 6:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Aramark, Yes Care, Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Aramark et al
as 2:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Aramark, Yes Care, Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Ivey et al
as 6:2022cv02298
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Kimberly A Wilson, Ronald Tomblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
