Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Wells v. Byl
as 2:2015cv01568
Defendant: Neil F. Byl
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse
as 2:2015cv01570
Defendant: Daniel R. Kruse
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2015cv01527
Defendant: Marc Brown, Neil F. Byl, Peter Gartlen and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01218
Defendant: Mark Nooth
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01116
Defendant: Mark Nooth
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01057
Defendant: Mark Nooth
Plaintiff: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv00852
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Stewart
as 3:2014cv01979
Respondent: Heide Stewart
Petitioner: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Coffee Creek Correctional Facility Medical Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01010
Plaintiff: Leonard Jacob Boyd
Defendant: Coffee Creek Correctional Facility Law Library Administration, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility Medical Administration, Dr. Diehl and others
Health Services Staff Of Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution: Dr. Vanhauten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Gorrin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv06186
Respondent: Shari Block, DHS, Brian Gorrin and others
Petitioner: Leroy L. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?