Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Peters v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2014cv01803
Petitioner:
David Peters
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conlon v. Kelly
as 1:2014cv01668
Petitioner:
Peter Conlon
Respondent:
Bennie Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Armark Food Company Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Brooks
Defendant:
Armark Food Company Corporation, Ms. King and Mr. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manna v. Coakley, et al
as 4:2013cv02592
Petitioner:
Peter Manna
Respondent:
Joe Coakley and Prisons, Federal Bureau of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Groce v. Jopek et al
as 1:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Eugene Groce
Defendant:
Officer Jopek, Officer Todd, Officer Schmitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krug v. Economus
as 4:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Krug
Defendant:
Peter C. Economus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna v. City of Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv02594
Plaintiff:
Ramon Luna
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Police Department, William Mason, Deborah Naiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Greene County Common Pleas Court and Jurors et al
as 3:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Greene County Common Pleas Court and Jurors, William DeBoard, Glenn George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himmelreich v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2010cv02404
Plaintiff:
Walter J Himmelreich
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Peter B. Macari, Roger Oberkramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kimmel et al
as 3:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Edward R Kimmel, Stephen K Haller, William DeBoard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
