Cases 41 - 50 of 3,257
Williams v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv04703
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Barry Chester Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Barwick
as 3:2024cv50218
Petitioner:
Marvin Williams
Respondent:
John Barwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1-4, Thomas Dart and Correctional Sergeant Williams
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Defendant:
Warden Brian Lammer
Plaintiff:
William Byron Benedict
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frese v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
William Frese, Jr
Defendant:
Adjustment Committee, Diane Skorch and Gregory D Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv04485
Defendant:
Elvis Ortega, City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Grimes et al
as 3:2024cv01367
Defendant:
Richard Watson, C/O Williams, Captain Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin E. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01191
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Jeremiah Brown
Petitioner:
Jackie Lee Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. The City of Cherry Valley et al
as 3:2024cv50196
Plaintiff:
William Chatman
Defendant:
Jane Doe, The City Of Rockford, Rockford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
