Cases 41 - 50 of 238
Haynes v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gregory Haynes
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. G.T.L. et al
as 3:2023cv04054
Plaintiff:
Willie Hall
Defendant:
G.T.L., Anthony Wills and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ottensmeier et al
as 3:2023cv04057
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brown
Defendant:
Marcelus Ottensmeier, Devin McKinney, Jessica Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Wills et al
as 1:2023cv16959
Petitioner:
Curtis Shields
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Brumleve et al
as 3:2023cv03959
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Sergeant Brumleve, Jilian Crane, L. Krondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendricks v. Hugehs
as 1:2023cv01449
Petitioner:
Rickie Kendricks
Respondent:
Latoya Hugehs and Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seats v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03876
Plaintiff:
Devin Seats
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and Menard Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua Schoenbeck, C/O Lauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abuharba v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2023cv03834
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Nathan McCarthy, Joshua Schoenbeck, Anthony Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
