Cases 41 - 50 of 15,675
Bartles (PS) v. Burnett et al
as 1:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartles
Defendant:
Chris Burnett and City of Loveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01397
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
State of Colorado and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01399
Plaintiff:
Justin Walker
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hume (PS) v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Coalin Joshua Hume
Defendant:
Attorney General, People of the State of Colorado, The and Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott (PS) v. CJC et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
CJC, El Paso County and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windom v. USA
as 1:2024cv01343
Petitioner:
Samuel Terraye Windom
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sollis (PS) v. Mesa County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv01368
Petitioner:
Scott Allan Sollis
Respondent:
Mesa County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson (PS) v. Claps
as 1:2024cv01366
Petitioner:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Respondent:
Gene Claps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walking Eagle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Kevin Walking Eagle
Respondent:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
