Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Luevano v. Obama et al
as 5:2012cv03256
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
B. H. Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Office of Pardon Attorney, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. Langdon et al
as 5:2012cv03213
Plaintiff:
Modest T. Foster
Defendant:
Andrew T. Langdon, Morgan H. Bracken, Gregory M. Pert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kioko v. Kline et al
as 5:2012cv03173
Petitioner:
Meshack Kioko
Respondent:
Richard C. Kline, Kenneth Carlson , John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03218
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Clark
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Jerry Boyle, Jon Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Fernando et al
as 5:2011cv03153
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Galloway, Sr
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, Michael Shields, (fnu) Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2010cv03135
Petitioner:
Troy H. Nelson
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Steven Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish v. Garrett et al
as 5:2010cv03051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Marquis Garrett, Shelley Laurent, William H. Bair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Vratil et al
as 5:2009cv03280
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kathryn H. Vratil and Jacquelyn E. Rokusek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services et al
as 5:2009cv03091
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Davis
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, Carol J. Bacon, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnell v. Vratil et al
as 5:2009cv03057
Plaintiff:
Rolly O. Kinnell
Defendant:
Kathryn H. Vratil, Sam A. Crow, David R. McKune and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
