Cases 51 - 60 of 112
Banks v. Platt et al
as 5:2015cv03093
Plaintiff:
Albert Dewayne Banks
Defendant:
David R. Platt, Steven L. Opat, Glen F. Virden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Miller et al
as 5:2015cv03085
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Brown
Defendant:
Mark Miller, Pat Davis and Meade, Kansas, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Platt et al
as 5:2015cv03087
Plaintiff:
Walter Banks
Defendant:
David R. Platt, Steven L. Opat, Sprint/Nextel Wireless Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloman (ID 33262) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2015cv03067
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Holloman
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr, (fnu) Hunt, (fnu) Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03085
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, (fnu) Bunting, (fnu) Hagenbuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia (ID 37933) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03066
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Garcia
Defendant:
(fnu) Waddington, (fnu) Newport, Erica Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laicer v. Wichita Kansas, District Court et al
as 5:2013cv03185
Petitioner:
Ravi S. Laicer
Respondent:
Wichita Kansas, District Court, Kansas, State of, John E. Stang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galloway (ID 35838) v. Fernando et al
as 5:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Galloway, Sr
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, (fnu) Shield, (fnu) Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown (ID 68348) v. McKune et al
as 5:2013cv03078
Petitioner:
Corey Brown
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salary (ID 96349) v. Robert et al
as 5:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Salary
Defendant:
Ray Robert, (fnu) Waddingon, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
