Cases 51 - 60 of 143
Sarpong v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00017
Petitioner:
Ernest F.K. Sarpong
Respondent:
United States of America , Department of Homeland Security , Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. Clinton et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Petitioner:
Ana L Guerrero
Respondent:
Hillary Clinton , Janet Napolitano , Antonio Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kim v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv00325
Petitioner:
Tran Minh Kim
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ermin v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv00378
Petitioner:
Sisic Ermin
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vargas et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Vargas and Alicia Garcia Martinez
Defendant:
Michael T Freeman , Eliseo Cabrera , Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
La Touche v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv05256
Petitioner:
John La Touche
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr, Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cova v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv05186
Petitioner:
Adonis A Rodriguez Cova
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr, Janet Napolitano, Kenneth Landgrebe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. U. S. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U. S. Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Department of Labor, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kamagara v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00291
Petitioner:
Allan Kamagara
Respondent:
Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atenafu v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv05182
Petitioner:
Abayu A. Atenafu
Respondent:
Eric H Holder , Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
