Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Ochlech v. Mason et al
as 5:2013cv03138
Plaintiff:
Charles William Ochlech, III
Defendant:
(fnu) Mason, K. Aulepp, J. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Soboroff v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03082
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, (fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soboroff v. Scrivner et al
as 5:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
(fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem, (fnu) Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Evans et al
as 5:2013cv03035
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03026
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03020
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dixon (ID 93766) v. Westblade et al
as 5:2013cv03017
Plaintiff:
Derrick Deron Dixon
Defendant:
Wayne K. Westblade and C. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dominguez v. Dixon
as 5:2012cv03093
Petitioner:
Benito M. Dominguez
Respondent:
K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All Filings to be Made in Case 06-20047-01-CM Only***
as 2:2012cv02054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Johnnie K. Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
