Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 51 - 60 of 626
Pulley v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00174
Petitioner: Aaron Jershon Pulley
Respondent: Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mongeau v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff: Steven Mongeau
Defendant: Kelly Rowe and Well Path Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Richards v. Kelly S. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: Joseph Richards
Defendant: Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody S. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv02705
Petitioner: Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Janica We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner: Dennis Lee Rivers
Respondent: Sheriff Kelly Janica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02655
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Kelly
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Police Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff: Jay G Kelly
Defendant: Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomo v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff: Crisanto Palomo
Defendant: Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff: Joseph Richards
Defendant: Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff: Benjamin Miller
Defendant: Sheriff Kelly Rowe and Charle Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?