Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Jaquez v. Lane et al
as 4:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Henry Jaquez
Defendant:
Reese Lane, Kelly Birch and Paul Mathews
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Toliver et al
as 4:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
David Lee Evans
Defendant:
Steve Toliver, Reese Lane, Doctor Ward and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steger v. Hickey et al
as 5:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Lee Steger
Defendant:
Roberta Hickey, Lane Blair, C Anson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Smith et al
as 5:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Clay
Defendant:
Fern Smith, Wes Lane and Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Lane et al
as 4:2007cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry J Jaquez
Defendant:
Reese Lane, Paul Matthews and Gina Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2007cv00496
Plaintiff:
Erick Brandon Moore
Defendant:
John Whetsel, Officer Lane and Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Lane et al
as 5:2007cv00339
Plaintiff:
Johnetta Lavonne Rowe
Defendant:
C Wesley Lane, II, Mike Fisher and Arron Balch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Draper v. Bowan et al
as 5:2007cv00237
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Draper
Defendant:
Don Bowan, Griffin Memorial Hospital, John Whetsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Thurman Harvey Hines
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma State Court(s), Oklahoma City Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conard v. Muskogee County Jail
as 6:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Conard
Defendant:
Muskogee County Jail, Raymond Barnes and Martin Lane, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
