Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Kelley v. The Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 6:2017cv01723
Plaintiff:
Micheal Don Kelley
Defendant:
The Lane County Circuit Court, The Lane County District Attorney, The Oregon Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaty v. Record's Lane County Jail
as 6:2017cv01510
Plaintiff:
Mickey D. Beaty
Defendant:
Record's Lane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayers v. Lane County Jail
as 6:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Ayers
Defendant:
Lane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arcoren v. Lane County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Arlen Lee Arcoren, II
Defendant:
Lane County Jail and D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Lane County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2016cv01846
Defendant:
Captain Dan Buckwald, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Leslie Lowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Trapp et al
as 3:2016cv01791
Defendant:
Captain Dan Buckwald, John Doe, Lane County Adult Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Leslie Lowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Feather et al
as 3:2016cv01536
Defendant:
4B Staff, Baumeister, Feather and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fricano v Lane County, et al
as 6:2016cv01339
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Lucy Kingsley, Lane County and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo James Fricano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Ives et al
as 3:2016cv00816
Defendant:
Ball, Warden Ives, Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Price et al
as 3:2016cv00802
Defendant:
Baumeister, Known and Unknown FCI Sheridan's Staff, Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
