Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Thorp v. Montana State Supreme Court et al
as 1:2012cv00060
Petitioner:
Lewis Gale Thorp
Respondent:
Montana State Supreme Court and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huffine v. McGrath et al
as 6:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eldon Huffine
Defendant:
Mike McGrath and Steve Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Huffine v. Bullock et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Petitioner:
Lewis Eldon Huffine
Respondent:
Steve Bullock, Catherine Truman, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Kirkegard et al
as 1:2012cv00022
Petitioner:
Lewis Price, III
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Steve Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorp v. Montana State Supreme Court et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Petitioner:
Lewis Gale Thorp
Respondent:
Montana State Supreme Court and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Mahoney et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Petitioner:
Lewis Price, III
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiley v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Wiley
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Dwight McKay, Yellowstone County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larson v. Custer County District Court et al
as 6:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
James L. Larson
Defendant:
Custer County District Court, Lewis and Clark County District Court and Yellowstone County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Dale Petersen
Defendant:
State of Montana, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Lewis and Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
