Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Bailey v. Lockett et al
as 5:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leanders Bailey
Defendant:
Charles L. Lockett, Mrs. Ndife, C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Charles L. Locket et al
as 5:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Bailey
Defendant:
Charles L. Locket, FNU Ndife, J. Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BACON v. PHELPS et al
as 3:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
CARLTON PAUL BACON
Defendant:
J PHELPS, C KEMP and MARK HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Obama et al
as 5:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Beard
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Bureau of Prisons, Unit Team at USP Hazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beard v. Obama et al
as 5:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Beard
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, B.O.P., Federal Government. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv01611
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Phelps
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce et al v. Phelps et al
as 4:2009cv10083
Plaintiff:
Donald Bruce and Robert Pierce
Defendant:
Penny Phelps, Richard Roth, Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Peryam et al
as 4:2009cv10056
Plaintiff:
Alexis Perez Herrera
Defendant:
Bob Peryam, Penny Phelps, Tommy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Heaviland et al
as 4:2009cv10016
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Michelle Heaviland, Phelps, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Phelps et al
as 4:2009cv10009
Plaintiff:
Ervin Evans
Defendant:
Penny Phelps, Tommy Taylor, Michelle Heaviland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
