Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Allen v. Probation Officer
as 5:2010cv00854
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Allen
Defendant:
Probation Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. WI Probation and Parole Dept. et al
as 3:2010cv00228
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr., J.B. Van Hollen, La. Probation and Parole Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boston v. Anderson et al
as 3:2009cv01654
Plaintiff:
James B Boston
Defendant:
Steven Anderson and LA Dept of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatson v. Gralapp et al
as 1:2009cv01251
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gatson
Defendant:
Cole Gralapp and Division of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loyd v. Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Antonio Loyd
Defendant:
Probation & Parole, Roland Dudley and Charles Finkey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2008cv05182
Plaintiff:
Darryl Chevake Harris
Defendant:
Probation & Parole, Louisiana Parole Board, Department of Public Safety And Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01190
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Dept Probation, U S Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01189
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Probation, U S Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Warren v. Crowe et al
as 2:2008cv04038
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren
Defendant:
Bobby Crowe, Tim Phelps, Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Womack v. Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2008cv00577
Plaintiff:
Raythoil Womack
Defendant:
LA Dept of Probation & Parole, LA Dept of Public Safety and Robert Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
