Cases 51 - 60 of 1,550
Floyd v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv06506
Petitioner:
Robert Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Richardson v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50373
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Dukett et al
as 3:2022cv50422
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Lt. Dukett, Bergami, Capt. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States of America v. Davis
as 1:2022cv05562
Plaintiff:
Gerell Davis
Defendant:
United States of America and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Atkins v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv50344
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Atkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Carroll v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50318
Petitioner:
Craig Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Barmes et al
as 3:2022cv50322
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Barmes, Bergami, King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jerome Richardson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv05781
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pleasant v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03190
Petitioner:
Termass A Pleasant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gorbey v. Dole et al
as 3:2022cv50315
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Dole, John Doe, Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
