Cases 51 - 60 of 105
DA SILVA-PEREIRA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2010cv02505
Petitioner:
SIVONE DA SILVA-PEREIRA
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Holder et al
as 3:2010cv01006
Petitioner:
Hoang Nguyen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Awale v. Sabol et al
as 3:2010cv01008
Petitioner:
Dawit Zekarias Awale
Respondent:
Mary Sabol and Thomas Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2010cv01303
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN GONZALEZ
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beretay v. Sabol et al
as 3:2009cv01821
Petitioner:
Mohamed Beretay
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol, Thomas Decker, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Melbourne v. Decker et al
as 4:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
Wallace Melbourne
Defendant:
Thomas Decker and Kelly Mitra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALPHONSE v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv01564
Petitioner:
WILLARDUN ALPHONSE
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, THOMAS DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACQUES v. DECKER et al
as 2:2009cv01294
Petitioner:
DZIMTCHON JEAN JACQUES
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, THOMAS DECKER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brown v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2009cv00313
Petitioner:
Marvin L. Brown
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Thomas Decker and Warden Thomas V. Duran
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Adewusi v. Filip et al
as 1:2009cv00232
Petitioner:
Adesamni Adewusi
Respondent:
Mark Filip, Thomas Decker, L. Kolhorn and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
