Cases 51 - 60 of 581
THOMAS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv16164
Petitioner:
JONATHAN THOMAS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv15868
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2021cv14577
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O L. BYRD, SERGEANT PEER and CAPTAIN T. BLANQO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. HICKS et al
as 3:2021cv14258
Plaintiff:
RANDY KAREEM WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, F. ALBIANO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORECKY et al v. COUNTY OF OCEAN et al
as 3:2021cv12606
Plaintiff:
ANOTHONY R. KORECKY, TONY O. GONZALEZ and ANTHONY R. KORECKY
Defendant:
NINA L. CHAELTON-HAGEN, MR. TERIZZI, DORIS D'ANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv12498
Defendant:
CHARLES PETERSON, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBINSON and THOMAS RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYER et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv12393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TARBY, MANUEL DIAZ, GLENN JONES and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEFOGGI v. GUBBIOTTI
as 1:2021cv12428
Respondent:
THOMAS GUBBIOTTI
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY R. DEFOGGI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv12013
Defendant:
JUDGE PAUL INNES, MICHAEL D. GRILLO, ASSISTANT PROSPECTOR AMANDA NINI and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv09758
Petitioner:
TERRELLE NELSON
Respondent:
THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
