Cases 51 - 60 of 306
Voth v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00466
Plaintiff:
Frank Voth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv00218
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hejazi v. United States et al
as 6:2020cv00116
Defendant:
President of the United States, United States and United States Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poulson v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00022
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kermit Ty Poulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv02112
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Clackamas County Records Management, Clackamas County Sherrifs Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armand Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00003
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Clackamas County Records Management, Clackamas County Sherrifs Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armand Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Cruz v. United States et al
as 6:2019cv01939
Defendant:
United States, Attorney General of the United States and Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Victor Rafael Gonzalez-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01748
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01665
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thorson et al v United States of America
as 3:2019cv01654
Plaintiff:
William Smith, Christopher Turner, Adam Hassell and others
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
