Cases 51 - 60 of 3,957
v. Gresham et al
as 1:2023cv05107
Defendant:
William L. Gresham and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norwood v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04882
Petitioner:
Lanarion Norwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hardy v. USA
as 1:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
AVERY HARDY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leggett v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04824
Petitioner:
Michael Jerald Leggett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PEOPLES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
COREY T PEOPLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Choukri v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04750
Petitioner:
Aziz Choukri
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harpo-Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ward v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
Dustin Ward
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willis v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00208
Petitioner:
Chester Willis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
