Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Mitchell-Hunter v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv01477
Plaintiff:
Javier Mitchell-Hunter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guillen v. Ledezma et al
as 3:2008cv01464
Plaintiff:
Julian Guillen
Defendant:
Hector Ledezma and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Torres-Recio v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
Ramon L. Torres-Recio
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alcequiez v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01933
Plaintiff:
Roberto Alcequiez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hubbard v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01927
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Hubbard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cruz-Arroyo v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01866
Plaintiff:
Jose Gerardo Cruz-Arroyo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanjurjo-Figueroa v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01865
Plaintiff:
Angel T. Sanjurjo-Figueroa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sandoval-Mendoza v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01782
Plaintiff:
Sandra Patricia Sandoval-Mendoza
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jimenez-Firpo v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01783
Plaintiff:
Juan Jimenez-Firpo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cardona-Sandoval v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01746
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Emilio Cardona-Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
