Cases 51 - 60 of 152
STOKES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv06462
Plaintiff:
WILLIE STOKES, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HETRICK v. BOND et al
as 1:2017cv06284
Petitioner:
DONALD HETRICK
Respondent:
WILLIE BOND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEST v. BONDS
as 2:2017cv05294
Petitioner:
MITCHELL WEST
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYD v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv05053
Petitioner:
LAMONT BOYD
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAY v. BONDS et al
as 1:2017cv04276
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
ERIC GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIRON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv04048
Petitioner:
EMILIO GIRON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARDNER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv03438
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Petitioner:
RICHARD GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. BONDS et al
as 1:2017cv03439
Petitioner:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAULEON v. BANKS et al
as 3:2017cv03181
Petitioner:
MARGARITO MAULEON
Respondent:
WILLIE BANKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIETT v. BONDS et al
as 1:2017cv02543
Petitioner:
RALPH KIETT
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
