Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Valen Soto v. Schutt et al
as 1:2016cv00640
Defendant:
Allen Bernstrom, Allison Martin, Kiki Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Valen Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richmond v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00448
Defendant:
Cara Delozier, Rory Herrera, Danielle Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00306
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richmond v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv00145
Defendant:
Anna Brown, Jeremy Cory, Rory Herrera and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2015cv02390
Defendant:
Victor Beerbower, Lt. Boston, Jill Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Premo
as 6:2015cv01783
Petitioner:
Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00331
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00226
Defendant:
Dr. Dagner, Michael Gower, J. Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2014cv02057
SRCI:
Cone, Dayton, Judy Gilmore and others
Defendant:
Michael Gower
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
ODOC:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
