Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Benge v. Deloy et al
as 1:2008cv00078
Petitioner:
John H. Benge, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Deloy and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Awala v. Barkett et al
as 1:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
Rosemary Barkett, Susan H. Black, Adelbato Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awala v. Alito et al
as 1:2007cv00750
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
Samuel Alito, Jr., Joseph Biden, John G. Roberts, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv00656
Plaintiff:
Augustus H. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Cindy Wright, Rebecca McBride, Thomas Zanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Hudson, G.W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimbley v. Candace
as 1:2007cv00466
Plaintiff:
John H. Wimbley
Defendant:
Candace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cephas v. Dupont et al
as 1:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cameana M. Cephas
Defendant:
William H. Dupont and Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimbley v. McReynolds
as 1:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
John H. Wimbley
Defendant:
Jermaine McReynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Correction Medical Service
as 1:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Emanuel H. Jones
Defendant:
Correction Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awala v. U.S. Attorney's Office Delaware et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office Delaware, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Lisa Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
