Cases 61 - 70 of 434
Arrestouilh v. Adams County Sheriff Detective and Patrol Division
as 1:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Raymond E. Arrestouilh
Respondent:
Adams County Sheriff Detective and Patrol Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harvey v. Lisac et al
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Harvey, III
Defendant:
Lisac, Thompson, Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Walter M.J. Kolak
Defendant:
Tyler Brown, Wellpath, HSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrestouilh v. Adams County Detention
as 1:2022cv00244
Petitioner:
Raymond E Arrestouilh
Respondent:
Adams County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carmax et al
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kameron L. Williams
Defendant:
Carmax, Red Nolan Cadillac, The Albany Hotel Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Mangosa et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins and Loggings
Defendant:
Micheele, Elija Ballard Craft, Ben Mangosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kates v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv03239
Plaintiff:
David E. Kates
Defendant:
Thompson and Romain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Lovett
as 1:2021cv03230
Petitioner:
Dion E. Thompson
Respondent:
District of Colorado
Defendant:
Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henard v. Shradder
as 1:2021cv03123
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Henard
Respondent:
Jeff Shradder
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Services, Monica L. Alberts, Jamie Xiong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Wieser et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Petitioner:
Charles E. Evans
Respondent:
Phillip Wieser, Jeff E. Chostner, Emily Ann Vendenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
