Cases 61 - 70 of 1,118
Aurelio Martin Sepulveda v. James Hill
as 5:2023cv02195
Petitioner:
Aurelio Martin Sepulveda
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melody v. Hill
as 3:2023cv06210
Defendant:
sean melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Melody et al
as 3:2023mc80308
Defendant:
Sean Melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ochoa v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Ochoa
Defendant:
James Hill, Dr. John Hodges, Dr. Luzviminda Saidro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Godinez v. CDCR Custody Staff et al
as 3:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Rafael Godinez
Defendant:
CDCR Custody Staff and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daron Ellis Hill v. B. Phillips
as 5:2023cv02073
Petitioner:
Daron Ellis Hill
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erin Ramon Amie v. J. Hill
as 2:2023cv07780
Petitioner:
Erin Ramon Amie
Respondent:
J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Foils et al
as 3:2023cv04402
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oliver Owens
Defendant:
Judge Foils, Judge Greenberg, Judge Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cymeyon V. Hill v. Paul Malko et al
as 5:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Paul Malko, Jannine Wallace and Samantha Lillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Leikauf et al
as 2:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Michael Alan Hill
Defendant:
Jeff Leikauf, El Dorado County Sheriff Jail-SLT, Well Path Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
