Cases 61 - 70 of 546
Starkey v. Chronister et al
as 8:2022cv02263
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Starkey
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Chambers, Cpl. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
OTIS CROSBY, JR
Defendant:
MICHELLE DANIELS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Softness et al
as 3:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Melissa Softness, Frank Bocanegra, Jose Paz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01636
Petitioner:
Josue Moises Perez-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Godhigh v. Paz et al
as 3:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Jose Paz, Gilberto Perez, Jair Butron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rolon et al
as 1:2022cv22683
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Williams
Defendant:
Rolon, W. Perez, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
James L. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Asbelti Llorens Cordero, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martelus v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Lukens Martelus
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews and Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Softness et al
as 3:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Melissa Ivy Softness, Jose Paz, Gilberto Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Softness et al
as 3:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Melissa Ivy Softness, Jose Paz, Gilberto Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
