Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Brown v. Miller
as 4:2016cv00600
Petitioner:
Milous Brown
Respondent:
Michele Miller and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2016cv00215
Petitioner:
Milous Brown
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swihart v. Richard et al
as 2:2016oe00157
Plaintiff:
Michael Swihart
Defendant:
Rhonda R Richard and Attorney General State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swihart v. Richard et al
as 2:2016cv00158
Petitioner:
Michael Swihart
Respondent:
Rhonda R Richard and Attorney General State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Khan v. Director for DHS et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Petitioner:
Abdul Nadeem Khan
Respondent:
Director for DHS, Attorney General of the United States and Victoria Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndiaye v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv02655
Petitioner:
Same Ndiaye
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Sheriff of Geauga County Jail, Chardon, Ohio, Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security (ICE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Apotosky v. Hanson et al
as 4:2015cv02491
Petitioner:
Wayne Apotosky
Respondent:
R. Hanson, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
May-Dillard v. District Attorney of the County of Cuyahoga, et al.
as 1:2015cv02252
Petitioner:
Maurice A May-Dillard
Respondent:
District Attorney of the County of Cuyahoga and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Khan v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015cv02014
Petitioner:
Abdul Nadeem Khan
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States and Victoria Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Miller et al.
as 4:2015cv01782
Petitioner:
Milous Brown
Respondent:
Michelle Miller and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
