Cases 61 - 70 of 164
Bluehorse v. Reno Justice Court et al
as 3:2017cv00714
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Naphcare Inc., Reno Justice Court and others
Plaintiff:
Akenaten Bluehorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Wickham
as 3:2017cv00712
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Allen
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bluehorse v. City of Reno, Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00702
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Naphcare, Inc., Reno, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Akenaten Bluehorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00591
Defendant:
Mike Allen, Carole Duncan and Matt Steinmitz
Plaintiff:
Felipe Arias Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonham v. Bear et al
as 2:2017cv02460
Defendant:
James Allen, Tami Bass, Bob Bear and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00582
Defendant:
Chuck Allen and The State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00526
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Nurse Eddie, Hahn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2017cv02156
Defendant:
L. Adams, Romeo Aranas, A. Buen and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00449
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Skagen and Smith
Plaintiff:
David Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lauzet v. Washoe County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2017cv00367
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, CEO of NaphCare Med, NaphCare Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Donnivan Alonzo Lauzet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
