Cases 61 - 70 of 140
Sturm v. Duke et al
as 7:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
John Sturm
Defendant:
David Duke and Ms Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2016cv01662
Plaintiff:
James Willie Duke, III
Defendant:
Dallas County and Dallas Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00424
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., FNU De La Rosa, Nicolas LaHood and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2016cv00385
Respondent:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Susan Pamerleau
Petitioner:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moten v. LaSalle Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00376
Defendant:
James Duke, Stacy King, La Salle Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wayne Moten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Duke v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2015cv03692
Petitioner:
Rusty Eugene Duke
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conley v. Harris County & Harris County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2015cv03577
Petitioner:
Xavier Levar Conley
Respondent:
Harris County & Harris County Sheriff's Office, Adrian Garci, Black Shirt Deputy Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00937
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., Bexar County Sheriff's Department, L. De La Rosa and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Pamerleau
as 5:2015cv00820
Plaintiff:
Mark Spencer Dukes
Defendant:
Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Olivarri et al
as 5:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Defendant:
Nicholas LaHood, Ray J. Olivarri and Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
